Kennedy v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
Erin Kennedy |
Does 1-99, inclusive and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
0:2018cv01744 |
June 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
XX US, Outside State |
John R Tunheim |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY. COUNSEL PLEASE NOTE: This docket contains pleadings and orders pertaining to this case only and some, but not all, orders from the master case file In re: Fluoroquinolone Products Liability Litigation, 0:15-md-2642 (JRT). Counsel shall read and comply with all Pretrial Orders filed in this master case. Pleadings filed and orders issued in the master case may be accessed through the master docket sheet at 0:15-md-2642-JRT. Additionally, access to Pretrial Orders, minutes, transcripts, and other documents issued in the master case may be found on the Fluoroquinolone MDL website at: # http://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/MDL-Fluoroquinolone/index.shtml.(lmb) |
Filing 7 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 4/25/2018. (lmb) |
Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of California Southern; Case Number 3:18-cv-01236. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per MDL List. |
Filing 5 Case transferred to District of Minnesota. Files transferred electronically to: *District of District of Minnesota*. (Attachments: #1 MDL No. 2642 CTO-126) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(rmc) [Transferred from California Southern on 6/29/2018.] |
Filing 4 ORDER Extending the Deadline for Defendant to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint. (ECF #3 ) It is hereby ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be July 10, 2018. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 6/15/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aef) [Transferred from California Southern on 6/29/2018.] |
Filing 3 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , Move or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Beroukhim, E.) (aef). [Transferred from California Southern on 6/29/2018.] |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Identifying Corporate Parent Schering Berlin Inc., Corporate Parent Bayer World Investments B.V., Corporate Parent Bayer US Holding LP, Corporate Parent Bayer Solution B.V., Corporate Parent Bayer HealthCare Holdings LLC., Corporate Parent Bayer US Finance LLC, Corporate Parent World Investments B.V., Corporate Parent Bayer Pharma AG., Corporate Parent Bayer AG. for Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (anh) [Transferred from California Southern on 6/29/2018.] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, case number 37-2018-00023425-CU-PL-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-11317439.), filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Case Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)The new case number is 3:18-cv-01236-DMS-KSC. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case.(anh) (sjt). [Transferred from California Southern on 6/29/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.