McKeever v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Barbara McKeever
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 0:2018cv01749
Filed: June 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Anoka
Presiding Judge: Tony N Leung
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2018 Filing 8 Social Security ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed electronically. (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 Documents Related to Administrative Process, #3 Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 Non Disability Related Development, #6 Disability Related Development Part 1, #7 Disability Related Development Part 2, #8 Disability Related Development Part 3, #9 Disability Related Development Part 4, #10 Medical Records Part 1, #11 Medical Records Part 2, #12 Medical Records Part 3, #13 Medical Records Part 4, #14 Medical Records Part 5, #15 Medical Records Part 6, #16 Medical Records Part 7, #17 Medical Records Part 8, #18 Medical Records Part 9, #19 Medical Records Part 10, #20 Medical Records Part 11, #21 Medical Records Part 12, #22 Medical Records Part 13, #23 Medical Records Part 14, #24 Medical Records Part 15, #25 Medical Records Part 16, #26 Medical Records Part 17, #27 Medical Records Part 18, #28 Medical Records Part 19, #29 Medical Records Part 20, #30 Medical Records Part 21, #31 Medical Records Part 22, #32 Medical Records Part 23, #33 Medical Records Part 24, #34 Medical Records Part 25)(Moss, Michael)
August 24, 2018 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Nancy A. Berryhill. (Moss, Michael)
July 19, 2018 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Barbara McKeever. Nancy A. Berryhill served on 6/27/2018, answer due 8/27/2018. (Fishman, Fay)
July 10, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Moss on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill. (Moss, Michael)
June 27, 2018 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill. (kt)
June 27, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: Social Security Case Assignment Form Issued. Per #Local Rule 7.2, this form must be submitted to the clerk in paper on or before the answer due date. Please mail the completed form to:U.S. District Court for the District of MinnesotaClerks Office300 South Fourth Street, Suite 202Minneapolis, MN 55415 (kt)
June 27, 2018 Filing 2 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung per Social Security List. Please use case number 18-cv-1749 TNL. (kt)
June 26, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6192132) filed by Barbara McKeever. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Fishman, Fay)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKeever v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Michael Moss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara McKeever
Represented By: Fay E Fishman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?