Ontiveros v. Ontiveros
Plaintiff: Tito Freddy Ontiveros
Case Number: 0:2018cv01916
Filed: July 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Katherine M Menendez
Referring Judge: Wilhelmina M Wright
Nature of Suit: Torts to Land
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff Tito Freddy Ontiveros's motion for summary judgment 22 is DENIED. Plaintiff Tito Freddy Ontiveros's motion to correct the record 21 is DENIED AS MOOT. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 4/2/2019. (RJE)
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright on 09/21/2018. (TJB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ontiveros v. Ontiveros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tito Freddy Ontiveros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?