Branch v. PACA et al
Plaintiff: Tanisha Branch
Defendant: PACA, Inc. and Apex International Mfg., Inc.,
Case Number: 0:2018cv01994
Filed: July 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Joan N Ericksen
Referring Judge: Steven E Rau
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on 8/31/2018. (CBC)
August 28, 2018 Filing 8 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #7 Stipulation of Dismissal. (Ahlberg, Ryan)
August 28, 2018 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Tanisha Branch. Jointly Signed by PACA, Inc. and Apex International Mfg., Inc.. (Ahlberg, Ryan)
July 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #5 Motion to Stay: All proceedings in this case are stayed until 8/27/2018 or until the Parties jointly request that the stay be lifted, whichever is earlier. The 7/23/2018 deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is adjourned until 8/27/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau on 7/24/2018. (MME)
July 23, 2018 Filing 5 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Settlement Discussions filed by Apex International Mfg., Inc.,, PACA, Inc.. (Emmons, Kristin)
July 17, 2018 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Apex International Mfg., Inc.,, PACA, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement (Brinkman, Ellen)
July 16, 2018 Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Joan N. Ericksen per 3rd, 4th, Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. Please use case number 18-cv-1994 (JNE/SER). (MMP)
July 16, 2018 Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendants Apex International Mfg., Inc.,, PACA. (Brinkman, Ellen)
July 16, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County District Court (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6230883) filed by Apex International Mfg., Inc.,, PACA. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Brinkman, Ellen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Branch v. PACA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanisha Branch
Represented By: Ryan H Ahlberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PACA, Inc.
Represented By: Kristin M Emmons
Represented By: David A Schooler
Represented By: Ellen A Brinkman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apex International Mfg., Inc.,
Represented By: Kristin M Emmons
Represented By: David A Schooler
Represented By: Ellen A Brinkman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?