Matthews v. Trepanier MacGillis Battina, P.A. et al
| Michael Matthews |
| Landlord Services, Inc. and Trepanier MacGillis Battina, P.A. |
| 0:2018cv02077 |
| July 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Tony N Leung |
| John R Tunheim |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Michael Matthews. Landlord Services, Inc. waiver sent on 7/25/2018, answer due 9/24/2018. (Peterson, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Michael Matthews. Trepanier MacGillis Battina, P.A. waiver sent on 7/25/2018, answer due 9/24/2018. (Peterson, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Landlord Services, Inc., Trepanier MacGillis Battina, P.A.. (KNK) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Chief Judge John Tunheim per 3rd, 4th - Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 18-cv-2077 (JRT/TNL). (KNK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6243181) filed by Michael Matthews. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Peterson, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
