United States of America v. $12,000 in U.S. Currency
| United States of America |
| $12,000 in U.S. Currency |
| Terry Scruggs |
| 0:2018cv02214 |
| July 30, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Hennepin |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| Becky R Thorson |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 841 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Motion to Dismiss and ANSWER to Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem filed by Terry Scruggs. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Ambrose, Robert) |
| Filing 5 CLAIM Verified Claim of Interest to Complaint for Forfeitute in Rem filed by Terry Scruggs. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Ambrose, Robert) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert H. Ambrose on behalf of Terry Scruggs. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(Ambrose, Robert) |
| Filing 3 WARRANT OF ARREST AND NOTICE IN REM issued. (kt) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. Please use case number 18-cv-2214 (PJS/BRT). (lmb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM against $12,000 in U.S. Currency filed by United States of America. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Tweeten, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
