Westfield Insurance Company v. Advanced Auto Transport, Inc. et al
| Westfield Insurance Company |
| Carolina Casualty Insurance Company, Gregory Lester Hansen and Advanced Auto Transport, Inc. |
| 0:2018cv02596 |
| September 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Michael J Davis |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Plaintiff Westfield Insurance Company. (Rowley, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Advanced Auto Transport, Inc., Carolina Casualty Insurance Company, Gregory Lester Hansen. (lmb) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 18-cv-2596 (MJD/KMM). (lmb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief against Advanced Auto Transport, Inc, Gregory Lester Hansen, and Carolina Casualty Insurance Company (filing fee $400, receipt number AMNDC-6352611) filed by Westfield Insurance Company. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-C, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rowley, Michael) Modified text on 9/6/2018 (lmb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
