Frank v. AMCOL Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Hilary Frank
Defendant: AMCOL Systems Inc and AMCOL Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2018cv02642
Filed: September 11, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Michael J Davis
Referring Judge: Katherine M Menendez
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER/NOTICE of Setting: Pretrial Conference set for 11/28/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8E (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 10/24/2018. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (KAT)
October 23, 2018 Filing 9 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant AMCOL Systems, Inc.. (Jensen, Aylix)
October 23, 2018 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint filed by AMCOL Systems, Inc.. (Jensen, Aylix)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER on #5 Stipulation Extending Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint. Defendant is GRANTED an extension, through October 23, 2018, in which to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 10/10/2018. (KAT)
October 9, 2018 Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 Stipulation. (Poncin, Michael)
October 9, 2018 Filing 5 STIPULATION Extending time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by AMCOL Systems, Inc.. (Poncin, Michael)
September 20, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hilary Frank. AMCOL Systems, Inc. served on 9/17/2018, answer due 10/9/2018. (Lyons, Thomas)
September 12, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to AMCOL Systems, Inc. (lmb)
September 12, 2018 Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 18-cv-2642 (MJD/KMM). (lmb)
September 11, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AMCOL Systems, Inc. (filing fee $400, receipt number AMNDC-6363301) filed by Hilary Frank. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Lyons, Thomas) Modified text on 9/12/2018 (lmb).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frank v. AMCOL Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hilary Frank
Represented By: Thomas J Lyons, Jr
Represented By: Katelyn Rae Cartier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMCOL Systems Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMCOL Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Aylix Jensen
Represented By: Michael S Poncin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?