Lukat v. Knutson
| Tyler Lukat |
| Nate Knutson |
| 0:2018cv02680 |
| September 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Becky R Thorson |
| John R Tunheim |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #8 Respondent's Motion to File and Serve Late Answer to Order to Show Cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 11/7/2018. (MSK) cc: Tyler Lukat. Modified text on 11/7/2018 (MMP).
|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Nate Knutson re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Order on Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs, , #9 Affidavit in Support of Motion (Marker, Peter) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Peter R. Marker in SUPPORT OF #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Order on Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs, filed by Nate Knutson.(Marker, Peter) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #4 Order on Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs, filed by Nate Knutson. (Marker, Peter) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Nate Knutson re #6 Notice of Appearance (Marker, Peter) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter R Marker on behalf of Nate Knutson. (Marker, Peter) |
| Filing 5 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Nate Knutson Attorney Substitution. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter Attorney Substitution)(Stockmeyer, Edwin) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Defendant(s)/Respondent(s) to file answer within 30 days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 9/28/2018. (MSK) cc: Tyler Lukat. Modified text on 10/1/2018 (MMP).
|
| Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Tyler Lukat. (kt) Document QC'd by KMH on 10/15/18 (KMH) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of Habeas Petition filed by Tyler Lukat.(kt) Document QC'd by KMH on 10/15/18 (KMH) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tyler Lukat. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per Fifth Division Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Appendix B, #3 Appendix C, #4 Envelope) (kt) cc: Lukat. (kt) Document QC'd by KMH on 10/15/18 (KMH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lukat v. Knutson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Tyler Lukat | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Nate Knutson | |
| Represented By: | Ana H Voss |
| Represented By: | Ann M Bildtsen |
| Represented By: | Peter R Marker |
| Represented By: | Edwin William Stockmeyer, III |
| Represented By: | Matthew Frank |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
