Reed v. Pride N'Living Home Care, Inc.
| Danielle Reed |
| Pride N'Living Home Care, Inc. |
| 0:2018cv02906 |
| October 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| David T Schultz |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Pride N'Living Home Care, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Provider Agreement, #2 Exhibit(s) Service Agreement (Reed Recipient), #3 Exhibit(s) Consumer and PCA Choice Agreement (Washington Recipient), #4 Exhibit(s) Employment Application (Reed), #5 Exhibit(s) Individual PCA Enrollment Application (Reed)) (Lawlyes, Matthew) |
Filing 13
ORDER on #11 Stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 11/21/2018. (TJB)
|
| Filing 12 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #11 Stipulation. (Lawlyes, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION (Second) for Extension to Answer or Respond and Toll FLSA Statute of Limitations by Pride N'Living Home Care, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Danielle Reed. (Lawlyes, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Danielle Reed of Consent Filing (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fisher, Michele) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Danielle Reed of Consent Filing (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fisher, Michele) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER on #5 Stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 11/1/2018. (LPH)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew P Lawlyes on behalf of Pride N'Living Home Care, Inc.. (Lawlyes, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #5 Stipulation. (Fisher, Michele) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION for Tolling of FLSA Statute of Limitations by Danielle Reed. (Fisher, Michele) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Danielle Reed. Pride N'Living Home Care, Inc. served on 10/15/2018, answer due 11/5/2018. (Fisher, Michele) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Pride N'Living Home Care, Inc. (lmb) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 18-cv-2906 (PJS/DTS). (lmb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pride N'Living Home Care Inc. (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6422358) filed by Danielle Reed. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - Reed Consent Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Fisher, Michele) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reed v. Pride N'Living Home Care, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Danielle Reed | |
| Represented By: | Neil Daniel Pederson |
| Represented By: | Michele R Fisher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pride N'Living Home Care, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael D Gavigan |
| Represented By: | Matthew P Lawlyes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
