Acosta v. Triple V Concrete Construction, Inc., et al
R. Alexander Acosta |
Jennifer Vanderwerf, Layne Vanderwerf and Triple V Concrete Construction, Inc. |
0:2018cv02942 |
October 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Tony N Leung |
Eric C Tostrud |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by R. Alexander Acosta. Jennifer Vanderwerf waiver sent on 10/25/2018, answer due 12/24/2018. (Frydl, Martha) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by R. Alexander Acosta. Layne Vanderwerf waiver sent on 10/25/2018, answer due 12/24/2018. (Frydl, Martha) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by R. Alexander Acosta. Triple V Concrete Construction, Inc. waiver sent on 10/25/2018, answer due 12/24/2018. (Frydl, Martha) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Triple V Concrete Construction, Inc., Jennifer Vanderwerf, Layne Vanderwerf. (kt) |
Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 18-2942 ECT/TNL. (kt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Frydl, Martha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.