International Decision Systems, Inc. v. JDR Solutions, Inc.
| International Decision Systems, Inc. |
| JDR Solutions, Inc. |
| 0:2018cv02951 |
| October 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| David T Schultz |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #15 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by JDR Solutions, Inc..(Warden, David) |
| Filing 18 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #15 Motion to Dismiss/General. (Siegel, Stanley) |
| Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Support re #15 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by JDR Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Siegel, Stanley) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #15 MOTION to Dismiss/General : Motion Hearing set for 1/28/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3B (STP) before Judge Eric C. Tostrud. (Siegel, Stanley) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by JDR Solutions, Inc.. (Siegel, Stanley) |
Filing 14
ORDER on #12 Joint Stipulation Extending Time to Answer Complaint. Granting extension to 12/12/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 11/15/2018. (TJB)
|
| Filing 13 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #12 Stipulation. (Siegel, Stanley) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer Complaint by JDR Solutions, Inc.. Jointly Signed by International Decision Systems, Inc.. (Siegel, Stanley) |
|
Filing 11
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Richard M. Blaiklock for JDR Solutions, Inc..; granting #10 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Michael Heavilon for JDR Solutions, Inc.. Approved by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 11/1/2018. (JGK)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Michael D. Heavilon. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-6465638 filed by JDR Solutions, Inc.. (Siegel, Stanley) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney A. Richard M. Blaiklock. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-6465626 filed by JDR Solutions, Inc.. (Siegel, Stanley) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Stanley E Siegel, Jr on behalf of JDR Solutions, Inc.. (Siegel, Stanley) |
|
Filing 7
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Daniel D. Zegura for International Decision Systems, Inc.. Approved by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 10/24/2018. (JGK)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by International Decision Systems, Inc.. JDR Solutions, Inc. served on 10/22/2018, answer due 11/13/2018. (Walsh, Peter) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to JDR Solutions, Inc. (lmb) |
| Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 18-cv-2951 (ECT/DTS). (lmb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Daniel D. Zegura. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-6439969 filed by International Decision Systems, Inc.. (Walsh, Peter) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. IDS Group, Inc. is a corporate parent of Plaintiff International Decision Systems, Inc.. (Walsh, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JDR Solutions, Inc. (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6439531) filed by International Decision Systems, Inc.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Walsh, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
