Young et al. v. New London Spicer Public Schools et al
| Shawn Young and Stephanie Young |
| Palmer Bus Service and New London Spicer Public Schools |
| 0:2018cv03031 |
| October 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Joan N Ericksen |
| Tony N Leung |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Shawn Young re #13 Reply, #14 Declaration in Support (Kane, Margaret) |
| Filing 14 Declaration of Margaret O'Sullivan Kane in Support of #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Shawn Young, Stephanie Young. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Redlined Amended Complaint)(Kane, Margaret) |
| Filing 13 REPLY re #11 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion filed by Shawn Young, Stephanie Young. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate Certificate of Compliance)(Kane, Margaret) |
| Filing 12 DECLARATION of Stephen M. Knutson in Opposition to #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by New London Spicer Public Schools. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibits 1-5)(Saphner, Katharine) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by New London Spicer Public Schools, Palmer Bus Service. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Saphner, Katharine) |
| Filing 10 Palmer Bus Service's ANSWER to Complaint Cross-Claim of New London-Spicer Public Schools filed by Palmer Bus Service. (Murphy, Timothy) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Crossclaim of Palmer Bus Service filed by New London Spicer Public Schools. (Saphner, Katharine) Modified text on 11/26/2018 (lmb). |
Filing 8
ORDER FOR PARTY TO FILE DOCUMENT/RESPOND TO COURT re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court . Within 30 days of the motion being decided, Plaintiff shall contact the chambers of Magistrate Judge Tony Leung, by letter or e-mail, for the purpose of scheduling the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 11/19/2018. (HAM)
|
| Filing 7 Declaration of Margaret O'Sullivan Kane in Support of #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Shawn Young, Stephanie Young. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit No. 1)(Kane, Margaret) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Shawn Young. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate Certificate of Compliance)(Kane, Margaret) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court : Motion Hearing set for 1/17/2019 at 02:00 PM in Judge's Chambers 12W (MPLS) before Judge Joan N. Ericksen. (Kane, Margaret) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Shawn Young. (Kane, Margaret) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint , CROSSCLAIM against New London Spicer Public Schools. filed by Palmer Bus Service. (Murphy, Timothy) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Joan N. Ericksen per 3rd, 4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 18-cv-3031 (JNE/TNL). (MMP) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Eighth Judicial District, case number 34-CV-18-564 (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6462585) filed by New London Spicer Public Schools. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit(s) School District's Answer, #3 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Knutson, Stephen) Modified text on 10/29/2018 (MMP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
