Ferguson v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: James Ferguson
Defendant: Minnesota Department of Corrections, Fred McRae Roberson and Centurion of Minnesota, LLC
Case Number: 0:2018cv03075
Filed: November 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Katherine M Menendez
Referring Judge: John R Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2018 Filing 17 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by James Ferguson requesting postponement of pretrial. (Carey, Shannon)
December 17, 2018 Filing 16 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re Stipulation of Granting Dismissal with Prejudice #15 Stipulation of Dismissal. (Tabbert, Leah)
December 17, 2018 Filing 15 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Minnesota Department of Corrections. (Tabbert, Leah)
November 30, 2018 Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Fred McRae Roberson. (Rauch, Nicholas)
November 27, 2018 Filing 13 (Text-Only) Notice to Attorney regarding Dispositive Motions briefing schedule: All dispositive motions must comply with Local Rule 7.1(c). Responses to dispositive motions shall be filed with the Court on or before 21 days after the service of the supporting memorandum to the original motion. Replies to responsive briefs shall be filed 14 days after the service of the response to the dispositive motion. Upon the motion being fully briefed and filed, counsel for the moving party shall email Chief Judge Tunheims chambers at Tunheim_Chambers@mnd.uscourts.gov to request a hearing date. Upon receiving from Chief Judge Tunheims Courtroom Deputy a hearing date, time and location, the moving party shall file the amended notice of hearing at that time. (HAZ)
November 26, 2018 Filing 12 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re Motion to dismiss #9 Notice of Hearing on Motion, #11 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #8 Motion to Dismiss/General, #10 Meet and Confer Statement. (Tabbert, Leah)
November 26, 2018 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Minnesota Department of Corrections. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Tabbert, Leah)
November 26, 2018 Filing 10 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #8 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Minnesota Department of Corrections.(Tabbert, Leah)
November 26, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #8 MOTION to Dismiss/General : Date and time to be determined. (Tabbert, Leah)
November 26, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss/General filed by Minnesota Department of Corrections. (Tabbert, Leah)
November 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER/NOTICE of Setting: Pretrial Conference set for 1/9/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8E (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 11/16/2018. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (KAT)
November 16, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Leah M Tabbert on behalf of Minnesota Department of Corrections. (Tabbert, Leah)
November 15, 2018 Filing 5 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Centurion of Minnesota, LLC is a limited liability company owned by Centurion, LLC. (Novak, Anthony) Modified text on 11/19/2018 (MMP).
November 15, 2018 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Centurion of Minnesota, LLC. (Novak, Anthony)
November 1, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Centurion of Minnesota, LLC, Minnesota Department of Corrections, Fred McRae Roberson. (AKL)
November 1, 2018 Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per 3rd, 4th - Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 18cv3075 JRT/KMM. (AKL)
November 1, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Centurion of Minnesota, LLC, Minnesota Department of Corrections, Fred McRae Roberson (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6470397) filed by James Ferguson. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Carey, Shannon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ferguson v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Minnesota Department of Corrections
Represented By: Leah M Tabbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fred McRae Roberson
Represented By: Nicholas Andrew Rauch
Represented By: Eric J Steinhoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Centurion of Minnesota, LLC
Represented By: Anthony J Novak
Represented By: Mark A Solheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Ferguson
Represented By: Shannon C. Carey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?