Nathanson v. Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc.
Plaintiff: Nancy Nathanson and Nancy K. Nathanson
Defendant: Diversified Adjustment Service Inc and Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2018cv03102
Filed: November 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Patrick J Schiltz
Referring Judge: Elizabeth Cowan Wright
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER/NOTICE of Setting: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/29/2019. Pretrial Conference set for 2/5/2019 at 09:00 AM in Judge's Chambers, Suite 342 (STP) before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 12/21/2018. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (TMA)
December 13, 2018 Filing 6 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc.. (Newman, Patrick)
December 13, 2018 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc.. (Newman, Patrick)
November 30, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nancy K. Nathanson. Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc. served on 11/21/2018, answer due 12/12/2018. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Sheridan, Michael)
November 6, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc.. (kt)
November 6, 2018 Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 18-cv-3102 PJS/ECW. (kt)
November 5, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Diversified Adjustment Service Inc (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6476783) filed by Nancy Nathanson. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Sheridan, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nathanson v. Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Nathanson
Represented By: Michael J Sheridan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy K. Nathanson
Represented By: Michael J Sheridan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diversified Adjustment Service Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diversified Adjustment Service, Inc.
Represented By: Patrick D Newman
Represented By: Michael A Klutho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?