Anderson v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al
Roger Anderson |
Prosper Marketplace, Inc. and Equifax Information Services LLC |
0:2018cv03253 |
November 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Hildy Bowbeer |
Susan Richard Nelson |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Roger Anderson. Equifax Information Services LLC waiver sent on 11/28/2018, answer due 1/28/2019. (Chester, Anthony) |
Filing 4 TEXT ONLY NOTICE: Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer's Practice Pointers, which have recently been revised, are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's website (www.mnd.uscourts.gov). All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including any variances from the Local Rules.(JMK) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services LLC, Prosper Marketplace, Inc.. (AKL) |
Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 3rd, 4th - Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. Please use case number 18cv3253 SRN/HB. (AKL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6513857) filed by Roger Anderson. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Chester, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.