Soo Line Railroad Company v. American River Transportation Co., LLC
Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway and Soo Line Railroad Company |
American River Transportation Co., LLC |
0:2018cv03340 |
December 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Susan Richard Nelson |
Steven E Rau |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1333 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 (Text-only) ORDER in Response to #17 Letter to Magistrate Judge. Pretrial Conference set for 2/28/2019 has been RESCHEDULED to 3/4/2019 at 02:30 PM in Judge's Chambers, Suite 346 (STP) before Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau on 1/22/2019. (MME) |
Filing 17 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Soo Line Railroad Company . (Warner, Stephen) |
Filing 16 ORDER/NOTICE of Setting PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Rule 26 Meeting Report, Rule 26 Worksheet, and confidential settlement letters due by 2/21/2019. Pretrial Conference set for 2/28/2019 at 10:30 AM in Judge's Chambers, Suite 346 (STP) before Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau on 1/9/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (MME) |
Filing 15 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #13 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Theodore Hunt Lucas for American River Transportation Co., LLC.; granting #14 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Stanislav Levchinsky for American River Transportation Co., LLC. Approved by Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau on 1/8/2019. (JGK) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Stanislav Levchinsky. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-6583807 filed by American River Transportation Co., LLC. (Thomas, Richard) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Theodore H. Lucas. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-6583797 filed by American River Transportation Co., LLC. (Thomas, Richard) |
Filing 12 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. COMES NOW Defendant American River Transportation Co., LLC (ARTCO), by and through its undersigned attorneys, and for its corporate disclosure statement, states as follows: 1. ARTCO is a wholly owned subsidiary of ADM. 2. ADM is a publicly held corporation. Certain entities affiliated with State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company owned in total just over 10.15% of ADMs stock. Those entities are as follows: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, State Farm Life Insurance Company State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, State Farm Investment Management Corp., State Farm Insurance Companies Employee Retirement Trust, State Farm Insurance Companies Savings and Thrift Plan for U.S. Employees,State Farm Mutual Fund Trust, State Farm Associates Funds Trust, State Farm Variable Product Trust, and State Farm International Life Insurance Company. (Thomas, Richard) Modified text on 1/5/2019 (MMP). |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint filed by American River Transportation Co., LLC. (Thomas, Richard) |
Filing 10 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - already admitted - MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Daniel E. DeKoter. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-6578394 filed by Soo Line Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Affidavit of Proposed Admittee)(Warner, Stephen) Modified text on 1/2/2019 (MGV). |
Filing 9 NEW CASE FILING FEE PAID in the amount of $400, receipt number AMNDC-6578341. (Warner, Stephen) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Soo Line Railroad Company. American River Transportation Co., LLC served on 12/14/2018, answer due 1/4/2019. (DeKoter, Daniel) |
Filing 7 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Daniel E DeKoter for Soo Line Railroad Company. Approved by Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau on 12/12/2018. (JGK) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Daniel E. DeKoter. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-6578394 paid on 1-2-2019 filed by Soo Line Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Non-Resident to Serve as Local Counsel)(Warner, Stephen) Modified text on 1/2/2019 (MGV). |
Filing 5 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Canadian Pacific Railway Limited is a corporate parent of Plaintiff Soo Line Railroad Company. (Warner, Stephen) |
Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Daniel E. DeKoter as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #href=http://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/FORMS/court_forms.shtml#attorneyforms#. (MMG) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to American River Transportation Co., LLC. (MMG) |
Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. Please use case number 18-cv-3340 SRN/SER. (MMG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Soo Line Railroad Company (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6578341 paid 1-2-2019) filed by Soo Line Railroad Company. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Warner, Stephen) Modified text on 12/7/2018 (MMG). Modified text on 1/2/2019 (MGV). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.