Atlantic Zeiser GmbH et al v. NBS Technologies (US) Inc.
Petitioner: Atlantic Zeiser, Inc., Innovatime Industrie SARL and Atlantic Zeiser GmbH
Respondent: NBS Technologies (US) Inc.
Case Number: 0:2018mc00095
Filed: November 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: David S Doty
Referring Judge: Donovan W Frank
2 Judge: Tony N Leung
Nature of Suit: Miscellaneous civil case
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 TEXT-ONLY ORDER: Based on the parties' #13 Joint Stipulation Regarding Atlantic Zeiser GMBH, Atlantic Zeiser, Inc., and Innovatime Industrie SARL's Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena to NBS Technologies and the agreement outlined therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that #2 Atlantic Zeiser GMBH, Atlantic Zeiser, Inc., and Innovatime Industrie SARL's Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena to NBS Technologies (US) Inc. is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT and the #10 December 27, 2018 hearing is STRICKEN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 12/7/2018. (EB)
December 4, 2018 Filing 13 STIPULATION re #2 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Subpoena by Atlantic Zeiser GmbH, Atlantic Zeiser, Inc., Innovatime Industrie SARL. Jointly Signed by Atlantic Zeiser GmbH, Atlantic Zeiser, Inc., Innovatime Industrie Sarl, and NBS Technologies (US) Inc.. (Moerke, Katherine)
November 30, 2018 Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. This case is reassigned to Senior Judge David S. Doty. Judge Donovan W. Frank no longer assigned to the case. NOTE: the new case number is 18-mc-95 (DSD/TNL). Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. (lmb)
November 29, 2018 Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Atlantic Zeiser GmbH, Atlantic Zeiser, Inc., Innovatime Industrie SARL re #10 Amended Notice of Hearing on Motion (Moerke, Katherine)
November 29, 2018 Filing 10 STRICKEN per Order 14 filed 12/7/2018. AMENDED NOTICE of Hearing on Motion: #2 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Subpoena : Motion Hearing set for 12/27/2018 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 9W (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. (Moerke, Katherine) Modified text on 12/10/2018 (JLB).
November 28, 2018 Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Atlantic Zeiser GmbH, Atlantic Zeiser, Inc., Innovatime Industrie SARL (Moerke, Katherine)
November 27, 2018 Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per Miscellaneous list, referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. Please use case number 18mc95 DWF/TNL. (AKL)
November 26, 2018 Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena. (Moerke, Katherine)
November 26, 2018 Filing 6 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #2 Motion to Compel filed by Atlantic Zeiser GmbH, Atlantic Zeiser, Inc., Innovatime Industrie SARL.(Moerke, Katherine)
November 26, 2018 Filing 5 Declaration of Michael J. Hartley in Support of #2 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Subpoena filed by Atlantic Zeiser GmbH, Atlantic Zeiser, Inc., Innovatime Industrie SARL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Exhibit(s) 5)(Moerke, Katherine)
November 26, 2018 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM in Support re #2 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Subpoena filed by Atlantic Zeiser GmbH, Atlantic Zeiser, Inc., Innovatime Industrie SARL. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Moerke, Katherine)
November 26, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #2 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Subpoena : Date and time to be determined. (Moerke, Katherine)
November 26, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Subpoena filed by Atlantic Zeiser GmbH, Atlantic Zeiser, Inc., Innovatime Industrie SARL. (Moerke, Katherine)
November 26, 2018 Filing 1 Civil Cover Sheet re #2 Motion to Compel. (filing fee $ 47, receipt number AMNDC-6513287). (Moerke, Katherine) Modified on 11/27/2018 (AKL).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Atlantic Zeiser GmbH et al v. NBS Technologies (US) Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Atlantic Zeiser, Inc.
Represented By: Katherine A. Moerke
Represented By: David D Axtell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Innovatime Industrie SARL
Represented By: Katherine A. Moerke
Represented By: David D Axtell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Atlantic Zeiser GmbH
Represented By: Katherine A. Moerke
Represented By: David D Axtell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: NBS Technologies (US) Inc.
Represented By: Mark R Privratsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?