Spencer v. Marques
Petitioner: Antwoyn Spencer
Respondent: R. Marques
Case Number: 0:2018mc00102
Filed: December 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Eric C Tostrud
Nature of Suit: Miscellaneous civil case
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER. Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 1/17/2019. (kt) cc: Spencer. (kt)
December 14, 2018 Filing 1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 USC 2241 filed by Antwoyn Spencer. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil (Miscellaneous) list. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lmb) cc: Spencer Document QC'd by KMH on 12/18/2018 (KMH).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spencer v. Marques
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Antwoyn Spencer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: R. Marques
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?