Bluitt-Barnes v. AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. et al
| Lateesha R. Bluitt-Barnes |
| AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. and Repossessors, Inc. |
| 0:2019cv00022 |
| January 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Nancy E Brasel |
| David T Schultz |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER on #4 Stipulation to extend time to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 2/6/2019. (TJB)
|
| Filing 5 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #4 Stipulation. (McNulty, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.. Jointly Signed by Lateesha R. Bluitt-Barnes. (McNulty, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc., Repossessors, Inc. (lmb) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Nancy E. Brasel per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 19-cv-22 (NEB/DTS). (lmb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc., Repossessors, Inc. (filing fee $400, receipt number AMNDC-6584465) filed by Lateesha R. Bluitt-Barnes. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lyons, Thomas) Modified text on 1/4/2019 (lmb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
