ACUITY v. Extreme Lawns, LLC et al
| ACUITY |
| Joseph Kloster, Michael Velde, Susan A. Warren and Extreme Lawns, LLC |
| 0:2019cv00025 |
| January 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Wilhelmina M Wright |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Extreme Lawns, LLC, Joseph Kloster, Michael Velde, Susan A. Warren. (AKL) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per 3rd, 4th - Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 19cv25 WMW/ECW. (AKL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6584864) filed by ACUITY, a Mutual Insurance Company. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Warner, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
