Favors v. Johnson et al
| Joseph Anthony Favors |
| Dave Frey, Bruce Beaman and Nancy Johnson |
| 0:2019cv00032 |
| January 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 LETTER TO THE COURT from Joseph Anthony Favors. (JLB) |
| Filing 5 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Joseph Anthony Favors. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JLB) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk's Office to Joseph Anthony Favors re Filing Fee or App for IFP Due. (lmb) cc: Favors with App for IFP. |
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in Support re #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Joseph Anthony Favors.(lmb) Document QC'd on 1/23/2019 (NAH). |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Joseph Anthony Favors. (lmb) Document QC'd on 1/23/2019 (NAH). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bruce Beaman, Dave Frey, Nancy Johnson, filed by Joseph Anthony Favors. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz and referred to Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. (Attachments: #1 Complaint (Part 2 of 2), #2 Table of Contents, #3 Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Certificate of Service, #6 Envelope) (lmb) cc: Plaintiff. Document QC'd on 1/23/2019 (NAH). Modified event text on 2/6/2019 (lmb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
