Rapatt v. Whiteford

Petitioner: Richard Willmar Rapatt
Respondent: Glenn Whiteford
Case Number: 0:2019cv00042
Filed: January 8, 2019
Court: Minnesota District Court
0 Judge: David T Schultz
1 Judge: Eric C Tostrud
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2019 2 DECLARATION of Richard Willmar Rapatt re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Richard Willmar Rapatt. (lmb)
January 8, 2019 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing fee $5, receipt number 44641101584) filed by Richard Willmar Rapatt. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil (6th - Prisoner) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lmb) cc: Rapatt.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rapatt v. Whiteford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Glenn Whiteford
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard Willmar Rapatt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?