Howard v. State of Minnesota

Petitioner: Rico P. Howard
Respondent: State of Minnesota
Case Number: 0:2019cv00059
Filed: January 9, 2019
Court: Minnesota District Court
0 Judge: Hildy Bowbeer
1 Judge: Joan N Ericksen
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2019 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing fee $5, receipt number 44641101598) filed by Rico P. Howard. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Joan N. Ericksen per Civil (3rd, 4th - Prisoner) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Affidavits, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Cover Letter with receipt, #4 Envelope, #5 Envelope) (lmb) cc: Petitioner.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Howard v. State of Minnesota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rico P. Howard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Minnesota
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?