Flores v. 3M Company
| Matthew Flores |
| 3M Company |
| 0:2019cv00688 |
| March 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Hildy Bowbeer |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil 3rd, 4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. Please use case number 19-cv-688 (ECT/HB). (MMP) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by 3M Company re #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement, #1 Notice of Removal,, (Hulse, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant 3M Company. (Hulse, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fourth Judicial District, Hennepin County, case number 27-cv-19-2293 (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6734205) filed by 3M Company. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit(s) State Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit(s) State Affidavit of Service on 3M, #4 Exhibit(s) State Notice of Judicial Assignment, #5 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hulse, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
