Coleman v. 3M Company et al
| John Coleman |
| 3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC |
| 0:2019cv00802 |
| March 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| John R Tunheim |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 (Text-Only) NOTICE: This case has been transferred/extracted to the Northern District of Florida. (JAT) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-3) from the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation; transferring case to the Northern District of Florida for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Case assigned to Judge M. Casey Rogers. Associated Cases: 0:19-cv-00782-JRT-KMM et al.(kt) |
Filing 9
(Text-only) ORDER STAYING CASE: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that these proceedings are stayed in their entirety, including, without limitation, Defendants' obligation to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, until such time as the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation determines whether this matter will be transferred to an MDL and, if so, in what jurisdiction. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 4/16/2019. (KAT)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION to Stay Proceeding Pending Transfer to MDL by 3M Company. Jointly Signed by John Coleman, 3M Company, and Aearo Technologies LLC. (Hulse, Benjamin) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Coleman. Aearo Technologies, LLC served on 3/25/2019, answer due 4/15/2019. (Remele, Lewis) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Coleman. 3M Company served on 3/25/2019, answer due 4/15/2019. (Remele, Lewis) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT OF RELATED CASES. Case reassigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim and Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez for all further proceedings. Judge Eric C. Tostrud, Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer no longer assigned to case. NOTE: the new case number is 19-cv-802 JRT/KMM. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim, Judge Joan N. Ericksen, Judge Susan Richard Nelson, Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright, Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 3/26/2019 and by Judge Paul A. Magnuson on 3/27/2019. (kt)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to 3M Company, Aearo Technologies, LLC. (kt) |
| Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Mikal C. Watts, Francisco Guerra IV, Erin Rogiers, Paul Danziger, Rodrigo R. de Llano as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #href=http://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/FORMS/court_forms.shtml#attorneyforms#. (kt) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. Please use case number 19-cv-802 ECT/HB. (kt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3M Company, Aearo Technologies, LLC (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6752230) filed by John Coleman. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Remele, Lewis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
