Acosta v. Boe et al
| R. Alexander Acosta |
| Minn-Dak Asphalt, Inc., Kilen Boe, Minn-Dak Asphalt, Inc. Life Insurance Plan, Minn-Dak Asphalt, Inc. 401(k) Plan, Minn-Dak Asphalt, Inc. Health Plan and Minn-Dak Asphalt, Inc. Dental Plan |
| 0:2019cv00868 |
| March 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Wilhelmina M Wright |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kilen Boe, Minn-Dak Asphalt, Inc., Minn-Dak Asphalt, Inc. 401(k) Plan, Minn-Dak Asphalt, Inc. Dental Plan, Minn-Dak Asphalt, Inc. Health Plan, Minn-Dak Asphalt, Inc. Life Insurance Plan. (lmb) |
| Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per Civil (6th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 19-cv-868 (WMW/LIB). (lmb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jing Zhang on behalf of R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor. (Zhang, Jing) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT gainst All Defendants filed by R. Alexander Acosta. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Zhang, Jing) Modified text on 3/28/2019 (lmb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
