Arctic Cat Inc. et al v. Speed RMG Partners, LLC et al
| Textron Specialized Vehicles Inc., Arctic Cat Sales Inc. and Arctic Cat Inc. |
| Speed RMG Partners, LLC, Robby Gordon and Todd Romano |
| 0:2019cv00873 |
| March 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Myers, Aaron) |
| Filing 3 REPORT ON FILING OF PATENT/TRADEMARK ACTION (AO 120)(USPTO noticed with filing). (Myers, Aaron) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, Arctic Cat Sales Inc. and Arctic Cat Inc. state that they are an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Textron Inc. Textron Specialized Vehicles Inc. is also a wholly owned subsidiary of Textron Inc. No publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of Textron Inc.s stock. (Myers, Aaron) Modified text on 3/28/2019 (MMP). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Robby Gordon, Speed RMG Partners, LLC, Todd Romano (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6768637) filed by Arctic Cat Sales Inc., Textron Specialized Vehicles Inc., Arctic Cat Inc.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Myers, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
