Winona County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
| Winona County |
| Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC, Endo Health Solutions Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Purdue Pharma, Inc., Purdue Frederick Company Inc., The, Jane Does 1-50, Walgreens Boots Alliance d/b/a Walgreen Co., Mallinckrodt plc, Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation and Cephalon, Inc. |
| 0:2019cv00875 |
| March 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cephalon, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Jane Does 1-50, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. n/k/a Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt plc, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Frederick Company Inc., The, Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance d/b/a Walgreen Co. (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6769036) filed by Winona County. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Cicero, Mary Cate) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
