Starr et al v. 3M Company et al
| John Starr and Brent Babcock |
| Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company |
| 0:2019cv00972 |
| April 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Steven E Rau |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 (Text-Only) NOTICE: This case has been transferred/extracted to the Northern District of Florida. (JAT) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-5) transferring case to the Northern District of Florida per the MDL Panel for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Case assigned to Judge M. Casey Rodgers. (kt) |
Filing 10
(Text-only) ORDER on #8 Stipulation. Pursuant to the parties Stipulation to Stay Proceedings Pending Transfer to MDL, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that these proceedings are stayed in their entirety until such time as the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation determines whether this matter will be transferred to MDL No. 2555, pending in the Northern District of Florida before the Honorable M. Casey Rodgers. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau on 4/23/2019. (MME)
|
| Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 Stipulation. (Hulse, Benjamin) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION to Stay Proceedings Pending Transfer to MDL by 3M Company. Jointly Signed by John Starr, et al. and Aearo Technologies LLC. (Hulse, Benjamin) |
| Filing 7 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Aearo LLC is a corporate parent of Defendant Aearo Technologies, LLC. 3M Company is a publicly-held corporation owning 10 percent or more of stock of Defendant Aearo Technologies, LLC. (Rashid, Faris) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Aearo Technologies, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, CONSENT TO REMOVAL (Rashid, Faris) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Mikal C. Watts, Francisco Guerra IV, Erin Rogiers, Paul Danziger, Rodrigo R. de Llano as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #href=http://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/FORMS/court_forms.shtml#attorneyforms#. (JLB) |
| Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. Please use case number 19-cv-972 (ECT/SER). (JLB) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by 3M Company re #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement, #1 Notice of Removal, (Hulse, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant 3M Company. (Hulse, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hennepin County, case number 27-cv-19-4607 (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6794057) filed by 3M Company. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit(s) Order Companioning Cases, #3 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hulse, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
