Dimond v. Saul
James Robert Dimond |
Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Saul |
0:2019cv00989 |
April 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Becky R Thorson |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Social Security ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed electronically. (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 Documents Related to Admin Process including transcript 4-21-2016, #3 Payment Documents and Decisions 4-21-2016, #4 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices 4-21-2016, #5 Non Disability Related Development 4-21-2016, #6 Disability Related Development 4-21-2016, #7 Medical Records 4-21-2016 Part 1, #8 Medical Records 4-21-2016 Part 2, #9 Medical Records 4-21-2016 Part 3, #10 Medical Records 4-21-2016 Part 4, #11 Medical Records 4-21-2016 Part 5, #12 Documents Related to Admin Process including transcript 6-6-19 Part 1, #13 Documents Related to Admin Process including transcript 6-6-19 Part 2, #14 Payment Documents and Decisions 6-6-19, #15 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices 6-6-19, #16 Non Disability Related Development 6-6-19, #17 Disability Related Development 6-6-19, #18 Medical Records 6-6-19)(Sides, James) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Andrew Saul. (Sides, James) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by James D. Sides on behalf of Andrew Saul. (Sides, James) |
Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill. (KNK) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #2 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on 4/24/2019. (MSK) |
Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson for all further proceedings. NOTE: the new case number is 19-cv-989 (BRT). Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson and Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 4/23/2019. (JLB) |
Filing 7 TEXT ONLY NOTICE: Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer's Practice Pointers, which have recently been revised, are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's website (www.mnd.uscourts.gov). All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including any variances from the Local Rules.(JMK) |
Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Karl E. Osterhout for James Robert Dimond. Approved by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 4/12/2019. (NAH) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: Social Security Case Assignment Form Issued. Per #Local Rule 7.2, this form must be submitted to the clerk in paper on or before the answer due date. Please mail the completed form to:U.S. District Court for the District of MinnesotaClerks Office300 South Fourth Street, Suite 202Minneapolis, MN 55415 (lmb) |
Filing 4 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer per Social Security List. Please use case number 19-cv-989 (HB). (lmb) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Karl E. Osterhout. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-6797948 filed by James Robert Dimond. (Olson, Edward) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by James Robert Dimond. (Olson, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A. Berryhill filed by James Robert Dimond. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Olson, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.