Colvin v. Parker's Lake Apt
Case Number: 0:2019cv01045
Filed: June 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accomodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 Fair Housing Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER adopting 89 Report and Recommendation: denying as moot 87 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing this action without prejudice. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 7/27/2020. (SMD)
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER denying and denying as moot 60 Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider; denying and denying as moot 60 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time; denying and denying as moot 66 Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 10/29/2019. (MJC)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER denying 31 Plaintiff's Motion to Schedule a Hearing on Default Judgment; denying 42 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Adopting 52 Report and Recommendation; overruling 53 Plaintiff's Objection to Report and Recommendation; denying 17 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 6/28/2019. (MJC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Colvin v. Parker's Lake Apt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?