Colvin v. Parker's Lake Apt
0:2019cv01045 |
June 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Civil Rights: Accomodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 Fair Housing Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 ORDER adopting 89 Report and Recommendation: denying as moot 87 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing this action without prejudice. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 7/27/2020. (SMD) |
Filing 79 ORDER denying and denying as moot 60 Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider; denying and denying as moot 60 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time; denying and denying as moot 66 Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 10/29/2019. (MJC) |
Filing 59 ORDER denying 31 Plaintiff's Motion to Schedule a Hearing on Default Judgment; denying 42 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Adopting 52 Report and Recommendation; overruling 53 Plaintiff's Objection to Report and Recommendation; denying 17 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 6/28/2019. (MJC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Colvin v. Parker's Lake Apt | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.