ILKB of CNY, LLC et al v. Franchoice, Inc. et al
0:2019cv01064 |
February 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Contract: Franchise |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion to Alter/Amend/Supplement Pleadings(Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 5/6/2020. (TMA) |
Filing 58 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND MODIFYING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. The Court ADOPTS IN PART and MODIFIES IN PART the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated December 19, 2019 [Docket No. 51]. 2. Defendants Motion for Partial Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) [Docket No. 14] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART: Plaintiffs New York Franchise Sales Act claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to the extent it is based on the November 2015 Agreement and REMAINS to the extent it is based on the April 20, 2016 Multi-Outlet Agreement, and Teresa Ranieris Common Law Claims REMAIN. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 2/11/2020. (CEP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ILKB of CNY, LLC et al v. Franchoice, Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.