Stein v. Saul
Plaintiff: Mistelle Stein and Mistelle Gail Stein
Defendant: Social Security, Commissioner of and Andrew Saul
Case Number: 0:2019cv01153
Filed: April 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Steven E Rau
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2019 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mistelle Gail Stein. Nancy A. Berryhill served on 5/20/2019, answer due 7/19/2019. (Schneider, Mac)
May 29, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Moss on behalf of Nancy A. Berryhill. (Moss, Michael)
May 27, 2019 Filing 7 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - WILL REFILE - SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mistelle Gail Stein. All Parties. (Schneider, Mac) Modified text on 5/30/2019 (MMP).
May 10, 2019 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Nancy A. Berryhill. (MMP)
May 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau on 5/9/2019. (MME)
May 1, 2019 Filing 4 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Mistelle Stein. (Schneider, Mac)
May 1, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: Social Security Case Assignment Form Issued. Per #Local Rule 7.2, this form must be submitted to the clerk in paper on or before the answer due date. Please mail the completed form to:U.S. District Court for the District of MinnesotaClerks Office300 South Fourth Street, Suite 202Minneapolis, MN 55415 (CLK)
May 1, 2019 Filing 2 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau per Social Security List. Please use case number 19-cv-1153 SER. (CLK)
April 30, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security, Commissioner of filed by Mistelle Stein. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR. WILL BE REFILED In forma pauperis application, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Schneider, Mac) Modified text on 5/1/2019 (CLK).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stein v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security, Commissioner of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Michael Moss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mistelle Stein
Represented By: Mac Schneider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mistelle Gail Stein
Represented By: Mac Schneider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?