Hassan v. Barr et al
| Ahmed Mohamed Hassan |
| Thomas Homan, Kevin McAleenan, William P. Barr, Peter Berg, Eric Hollien and Hollien Eric |
| 0:2019cv01175 |
| May 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Tony N Leung |
| John R Tunheim |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Respondents to file answer within 30 days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 6/6/2019. (HAM) cc: Petitioner. Modified text on 6/10/2019 (lmb).
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory G Brooker on behalf of William P. Barr, Peter Berg, Thomas Homan, Kevin McAleenan. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Brooker, Gregory) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ahmed Mohamed Hassan re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 Memorandum, #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Ahmed Mohamed Hassan (CLK) Document QC'd by KMH on 5/2/2019 (KMH). |
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM TO SUPPORT #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ahmed Mohamed Hassan.(CLK) Document QC'd by KMH on 5/2/2019 (KMH). |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Ahmed Mohamed Hassan. (CLK) Document QC'd by KMH on 5/2/2019 (KMH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
