Meeker County, Minnesota v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
| Meeker County and Meeker County, Minnesota |
| Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc., McKesson Corporation, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Jane Does, 1-50, Mallinckrodt LLC, Endo Health Solutions Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Purdue Pharma, Inc., Cardinal Health Inc., Mallinckrodt Brand Pharmaceuticals, Inc., SpecGx, LLC, Mallinckrodt plc, Walgreens Boots Alliance d/b/a Walgreen Co., Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cephalon, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. and Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., The |
| 0:2019cv01211 |
| May 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Michael J Davis |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-93) transferring case to the Northern District of Ohio per the MDL Panel for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Case assigned to Judge Dan A. Polster. (kt) |
| NOTICE: The case has been transferred/extracted to the Northern District of Ohio. (kt) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Jane Does, 1-50, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., Mallinckrodt Brand Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt plc, McKesson Corporation, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Inc., SpecGx, LLC, Walgreens Boots Alliance. (KNK) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Cardinal Health Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., The, Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.. (KNK) |
| Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Linda Singer and Elizabeth Smith as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #href=http://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/FORMS/court_forms.shtml#attorneyforms#. (KNK) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per 3rd, 4th - Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 19-cv-1211 (MJD/ECW). (KNK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Jane Does, 1-50, Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Mallinckrodt Brand Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt plc, McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., SpecGx, LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance d/b/a Walgreen Co. (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6854911) filed by Meeker County. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cicero, Mary Cate) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
