Li v. Franchoice, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Xiaolin Li
Defendant: Franchoice, Inc. and Peter Gilfillan
Case Number: 0:2019cv01267
Filed: May 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Michael J Davis
Referring Judge: Elizabeth Cowan Wright
Nature of Suit: Contract: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER REFERRING #12 MOTION to Dismiss/General Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal of Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Franchoice, Inc., Peter Gilfillan to Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/2/2019. (GRR)
June 28, 2019 Filing 16 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #12 MOTION to Dismiss/General Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal of Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Franchoice, Inc., Peter Gilfillan.(Vettleson, Ryan)
June 28, 2019 Filing 15 MEET and CONFER STATEMENT re #12 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Franchoice, Inc., Peter Gilfillan.(Vettleson, Ryan)
June 28, 2019 Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss/General Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal of Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Support of Partial Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Franchoice, Inc., Peter Gilfillan. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Vettleson, Ryan)
June 28, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #12 MOTION to Dismiss/General Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal of Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) : Motion Hearing set for 8/2/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 3C (STP) before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. (Vettleson, Ryan)
June 28, 2019 Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss/General Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal of Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Franchoice, Inc., Peter Gilfillan. (Vettleson, Ryan)
June 14, 2019 Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Franchoice, Inc., Peter Gilfillan. filed by Xiaolin Li. No summons requested. (Garner, W)
June 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER on #8 Stipulation. 1.Defendants time to respond to the Complaint is extended until June 28, 2019, which is then the deadline for Defendants initial dispositive briefing; 2.Plaintiffs responsive briefing shall be due on July 12, 2019; and 3.Defendants reply brief is due on July 22, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 6/4/2019. (TMA)
May 31, 2019 Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 Stipulation. (Vettleson, Ryan)
May 31, 2019 Filing 8 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Franchoice, Inc., Peter Gilfillan. Jointly Signed by FranChoice, Inc., Peter Gilfillan, and Xiaolin Li. (Vettleson, Ryan)
May 31, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan O Vettleson on behalf of Franchoice, Inc., Peter Gilfillan. (Vettleson, Ryan)
May 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT OF RELATED CASES. Case reassigned to Judge Michael J. Davis and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright for all further proceedings. Judge Eric C. Tostrud, Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau no longer assigned to case. NOTE: the new case number is 19-cv-1267 MJD/ECW. Please use this case number for all subsequent pleadings. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/21/2019. Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 5/28/2019.(MMG)
May 20, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xiaolin Li. Peter Gilfillan served on 5/17/2019, answer due 6/7/2019. (Garner, W)
May 15, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Xiaolin Li. Franchoice, Inc. served on 5/15/2019, answer due 6/5/2019. (Garner, W)
May 14, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Franchoice, Inc., Peter Gilfillan. (KNK)
May 14, 2019 Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd, 4th - Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. Please use case number 19-cv-1267 (ECT/SER). (KNK)
May 13, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Franchoice, Inc., Peter Gilfillan (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6869990) filed by Xiaolin Li. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments FILED IN ERROR: #1 Summons - Franchoice, #2 Gilfillan) (#3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Garner, W)(KNK).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Li v. Franchoice, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Xiaolin Li
Represented By: W Michael Garner
Represented By: Erin C. Johnsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Franchoice, Inc.
Represented By: Ryan O Vettleson
Represented By: Sonia L Miller-Van Oort
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter Gilfillan
Represented By: Ryan O Vettleson
Represented By: Sonia L Miller-Van Oort
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?