Nelson-Scheffler et al v. Monsanto Company
Debbie L. Nelson-Scheffler and Steven Scheffler |
Monsanto Company |
0:2019cv01538 |
June 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Steven E Rau |
Eric C Tostrud |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE: The case has been transferred/extracted to the Northern District of California. (lmb) |
Filing 5 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-138) transferring case to the Northern District of California per the MDL Panel for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Case assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. (lmb) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Debbie L. Nelson-Scheffler. Monsanto Company served on 6/11/2019, answer due 7/2/2019. (Nemo, Anthony) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (MMP) |
Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. Please use case number 19-cv-1538 (ECT/SER). (MMP) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6930790) filed by Debbie L. Nelson-Scheffler, Steven Scheffler. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nemo, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.