Marden's Ark, Incorporated v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
| Marden's Ark Incorporated and Marden's Ark, Incorporated |
| UnitedHealth Group Incorporated |
| 0:2019cv01653 |
| June 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Patrick J Schiltz |
| David T Schultz |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint filed by UnitedHealth Group Incorporated. (Hoffman, Erin) |
| Filing 15 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Defendant UnitedHealth Group Incorporated. (Hoffman, Erin) |
Filing 14
ORDER on #12 Stipulation. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated answer due 8/19/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 7/19/2019. (TJB)
|
| Filing 13 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #12 Stipulation. (Hoffman, Erin) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Lawsuit by UnitedHealth Group Incorporated. Jointly Signed by Marden's Ark, Incorporated. (Hoffman, Erin) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Bryan K. Washburn on behalf of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated. (Washburn, Bryan) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan A Brennaman on behalf of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated. (Brennaman, Nathan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin L Hoffman on behalf of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated. (Hoffman, Erin) |
|
Filing 8
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Avi Robert Kaufman for Marden's Ark, Incorporated. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 7/9/2019. (JGK)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Avi R. Kaufman. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-6981896 filed by Marden's Ark, Incorporated. (Kaufman, Avi) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Stefan Coleman for Marden's Ark, Incorporated. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 6/27/2019. (NAH)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Stefan Coleman. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-6963698 filed by Marden's Ark, Incorporated. (Peterson, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Stefan Coleman, Avi R. Kaufman as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #href=http://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/FORMS/court_forms.shtml#attorneyforms#. (CLK) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to UnitedHealth Group Incorporated. (CLK) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Patrick J. Schiltz per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 19-cv-1653 PJS/DTS. (CLK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against All Plaintiffs (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-6956865) filed by Marden's Ark Incorporated. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Peterson, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
