MatrixCare Inc. v. Netsmart Technologies, Inc.
MatrixCare Inc. |
Netsmart Technologies, Inc. |
0:2019cv01684 |
June 26, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Michael J Davis |
Steven E Rau |
Fraud |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 ANSWER to Amended Complaint filed by Netsmart Technologies, Inc.. (Rivard, Ruth) |
Filing 55 JOINT MOTION REGARDING CONTINUED SEALING re #53 Exhibit 7 to Amended Complaint filed by MatrixCare Inc.. (Stradley, Paige) |
Filing 54 STATEMENT INSTEAD OF REDACTED DOCUMENT: Entire Document Confidential for #53 Sealed Document(s) - #53 Sealed Exhibit 7 . (Schultz, William) |
Filing 53 SEALED EXHIBIT Exhibit 7 re #52 Amended Complaint, by Matrixcare Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Schultz, William) |
Filing 52 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Netsmart Technologies, Inc.. filed by MatrixCare Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Exhibit(s) 5, #6 Exhibit(s) 6, #7 Exhibit(s) 8, #8 Exhibit(s) 9, #9 Exhibit(s) 10, #10 Exhibit(s) 11, #11 Exhibit(s) 12, #12 Exhibit(s) 13) (Schultz, William) Thumb drive received on 8/8/2019 (JGK). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 48 LR7.1/LR72.2 WORD COUNT COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE by Netsmart Technologies, Inc. re #47 Response to Objection to Report and Recommendation. (Rivard, Ruth) |
Filing 47 RESPONSE TO OBJECTION to #42 Report and Recommendation filed by Netsmart Technologies, Inc. filed by Netsmart Technologies, Inc..(Rivard, Ruth) |
Filing 46 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by MatrixCare Inc. . (Schultz, William) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 43 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations on MatrixCare Inc.'s TRO #42 Objection to Report and Recommendations. (Schultz, William) |
Filing 42 OBJECTION TO #38 REPORT AND RECOMMENTATIONS filed by MatrixCare Inc.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Schultz, William) |
Filing 41 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Netsmart LLC is a corporate parent of Defendant Netsmart Technologies, Inc.. (Conneely, Kevin) |
Filing 40 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Netsmart Technologies, Inc.. (Conneely, Kevin) |
Filing 39 JOINT MOTION REGARDING CONTINUED SEALING re #2 Exhibit 7 to Complaint filed by MatrixCare Inc.. Jointly signed by Netsmart Technologies, Inc.(Schultz, William) Modified text on 7/17/2019 (MMG). |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 36 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #35 Stipulation. (Schultz, William) |
Filing 35 STIPULATION Regarding Protective Order by MatrixCare Inc.. Jointly Signed by Netsmart Technologies, Inc.. (Schultz, William) |
Filing 34 TRANSCRIPT of Motions Hearing held on July 3, 2019 before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. (87 pages). Court Reporter: Carla Bebault. For a copy of the transcript, please file a Transcript Request under Other Filings/Other Documents.For information on redaction procedures, please review #Local Rule 5.5. Redaction Request due 7/31/2019. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/12/2019. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/8/2019. (CRB) |
Filing 33 NOTICE of Filing of Official Transcript. This filing has 1 transcript(s) associated with it. (CRB) |
Filing 32 TRANSCRIPT REQUEST for a COPY OF TRANSCRIPT #30 Motion Hearing, to Court Reporter Carla Bebault. (Conneely, Kevin) |
Filing 31 TRANSCRIPT REQUEST for an Expedited 3-Day Transcript of #30 Motion Hearing, to Court Reporter Carla Bebault. (Schultz, William) |
Filing 30 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson: Motion Hearing held on 7/3/2019 re #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested filed by MatrixCare Inc. (MSK) Modified text and file date on 7/10/2019 (MMG). |
Filing 29 LR7.1/LR72.2 WORD COUNT COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE by Netsmart Technologies, Inc. re #25 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Netsmart Technologies, Inc..(Conneely, Kevin) |
Filing 28 DECLARATION of Kevin D. Conneely in Opposition to #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Netsmart Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Exhibit(s) 5, #6 Exhibit(s) 6, #7 Exhibit(s) 7, #8 Exhibit(s) 8, #9 Exhibit(s) 9, #10 Exhibit(s) 10)(Conneely, Kevin) |
Filing 27 DECLARATION of Vincent D. Koehler, Jr. in Opposition to #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Netsmart Technologies, Inc..(Conneely, Kevin) |
Filing 26 DECLARATION of Christopher San Nicolas in Opposition to #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Netsmart Technologies, Inc..(Conneely, Kevin) |
Filing 25 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested filed by Netsmart Technologies, Inc..(Conneely, Kevin) |
![]() |
Filing 22 (Text-only) NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order: Motion Hearing set for 7/3/2019 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 6A (STP) before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. (MSK) |
Filing 21 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson: Telephone Status Conference held on 7/1/2019. (MSK) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Ruth A Rivard on behalf of Netsmart Technologies, Inc.. (Rivard, Ruth) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin D Conneely on behalf of Netsmart Technologies, Inc.. (Conneely, Kevin) |
Filing 16 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested filed by MatrixCare Inc..(Schultz, William) |
Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Mark Lanterman in SUPPORT OF #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested filed by MatrixCare Inc..(Schultz, William) |
Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Joseph Weber in SUPPORT OF #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested filed by MatrixCare Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Exhibit(s) C)(Schultz, William) |
Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Gary Pederson in SUPPORT OF #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested filed by MatrixCare Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A)(Schultz, William) |
Filing 12 Declaration of Lawrence G. Green in Support of #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested filed by MatrixCare Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Exhibit(s) 5, #6 Exhibit(s) 6, #7 Exhibit(s) 7)(Schultz, William) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested filed by MatrixCare Inc.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Schultz, William) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested : Date and time to be determined. (Schultz, William) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order - Expedited Handling Requested filed by MatrixCare Inc.. (Schultz, William) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MatrixCare Inc.. Netsmart Technologies, Inc. served on 6/27/2019, answer due 7/18/2019. (Schultz, William) |
Filing 7 EXHIBIT 8 - Corrected re #1 Complaint,. (Schultz, William) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Netsmart Technologies, Inc. (MMP) |
Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. Please use case number 19-cv-1684 (MJD/SER). (MMP) |
Filing 4 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. MatrixCare Holdings Inc. is a corporate parent of Plaintiff MatrixCare Inc.. (Schultz, William) |
Filing 3 STATEMENT INSTEAD OF REDACTED DOCUMENT: Entire Document Confidential for #2 Sealed Document(s) - #2 Sealed Exhibit 7 . (Schultz, William) |
Filing 2 PLACEHOLDER- SEALED EXHIBIT 7 re #1 Complaint, by MatrixCare Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Schultz, William) Modified text on 6/26/2019 (MMG). SEALED DOCUMENT RECEIVED IN CLERK'S OFFICE ON 6/26/19. (kt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Netsmart Technologies, Inc. (filing fee $ 400, receipt number BMNDC-6962340) filed by MatrixCare Inc.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Exhibit(s) 2, #3 Exhibit(s) 3, #4 Exhibit(s) 4, #5 Exhibit(s) 5, #6 Exhibit(s) 6, #7 Exhibit(s) 8, #8 Exhibit(s) 9, #9 Exhibit(s) 10, #10 Exhibit(s) 11, #11 Exhibit(s) 12, #12 Civil Cover Sheet) (Schultz, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MatrixCare Inc. v. Netsmart Technologies, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Netsmart Technologies, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Kevin D Conneely |
Represented By: | Ruth A Rivard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: MatrixCare Inc. | |
Represented By: | William D Schultz |
Represented By: | Paige S Stradley |
Represented By: | Joseph Dubis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.