Muhammad v. United States (FTCA) et al
| Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad |
| G. Kendal Hughes, Any & All Other Officials Discovered by Discovery, John Doe Bengston, John Doe, United States (FTCA) and Amy Burdick |
| 0:2019cv01750 |
| July 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| David T Schultz |
| Eric C Tostrud |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER denying #3 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 8/20/2019. (TJB) cc: Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad. Modified text on 8/21/2019 (MMP).
|
| Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad. (JGK) Document QC'd on 8/21/2019 (JGK). |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #1 Complaint. (JGK) Document QC'd on 8/21/2019 (JGK). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Any & All Other Officials Discovered by Discovery, Amy Burdick, John Doe, G. Kendal Hughes, John Doe Bengston, United States (FTCA) filed by Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Eric C. Tostrud per Civil (3rd, 4th - Prisoner) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T.Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JGK) cc: Muhammad. Document QC'd on 8/21/2019 (JGK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
