Byrd v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
| Tiba Byrd |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 0:2019cv02042 |
| July 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Leo I Brisbois |
| Susan Richard Nelson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Amended Complaint filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Myers, Gregory) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. filed by Tiba Byrd. No summons requested. (Peterson, Ryan) |
Filing 8
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE NOTICE AND ORDER: Pretrial Conference set for 10/23/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3 (DUL) before Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 8/16/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(JLB)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Myers, Gregory) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ONLY ENTRY: ORDER granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Craig Sanders for Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois on 8/1/2019. (JGK)
|
| Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Susan Richard Nelson per 5th Civil Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. Please use case number 19-cv-2042 SRN/LIB. (KDS) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. re #3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Craig Sanders. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7032637, #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement, #1 Notice of Removal, (Myers, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Craig Sanders. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7032637 filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Myers, Gregory) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Experian plc is a corporate parent of Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Myers, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Itasca County District Court (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7032589) filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Myers, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Byrd v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tiba Byrd | |
| Represented By: | Ryan D. Peterson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Gregory J Myers |
| Represented By: | Craig Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
