Seeman et al v. Hlady et al
| Lori Seeman and Paul Seeman |
| Rice County, Minnesota, Sheriffs' Deput John Doe, Deputy Tim Schmidtke, Sheriff Troy Dunn and Sergeant Mark Hlady |
| 0:2019cv02111 |
| August 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Steven E Rau |
| Wilhelmina M Wright |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright per 3rd/4th Civil Rights list, referred to Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. Please use case number 19-cv-2111 (WMW/SER). (MMP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7042946) filed by Paul Scott Seeman, Lori Katherine Seeman. No summons requested. ATTACHMENT FILED IN ERROR - (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Exhibit(s) Notice of Appearance, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet) (Irwin, Daniel) Modified text on 8/5/2019 (MMP). |
| (Text-Only) NOTICE - Judge Wilhelmina M. Wright's Practice Pointers are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including Judge Wright's deviations from the Local Rules with respect to motion scheduling and briefing deadlines. (RJE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
