Pierce et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
Pierce Investments, LLC, Kevin Pierce, Hawkes Co., Inc. and Pierce Investment Company |
Andrew Wheeler, United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Environmental Protection Agency and R.D. James |
0:2019cv02193 |
August 9, 2019 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota |
John R Tunheim |
Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
Environmental Matters |
33 U.S.C. ยง 1365 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 10 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Mollie R. Williams. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7072209 filed by Hawkes Co., Inc., Kevin Pierce, Pierce Investment Company, Pierce Investments, LLC. (Diehl, Samuel) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Daniel M. Ortner. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7072189 filed by Hawkes Co., Inc., Kevin Pierce, Pierce Investment Company, Pierce Investments, LLC. (Diehl, Samuel) |
Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Mollie R. Williams, Daniel M. Ortner as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #href=http://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/FORMS/court_forms.shtml#attorneyforms#. (CLK) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to R.D. James, United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew Wheeler. (CLK) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Anthony L. Francois. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMNDC-7072171 filed by Hawkes Co., Inc., Kevin Pierce, Pierce Investment Company, Pierce Investments, LLC. (Diehl, Samuel) |
Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 19-cv-2193 JRT/ECW. (CLK) |
Filing 4 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Plaintiffs Hawkes Co., Inc., Kevin Pierce, Pierce Investment Company, Pierce Investments, LLC. (Diehl, Samuel) Modified text on 8/12/2019 (MMP). |
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Plaintiffs Hawkes Co., Inc., Kevin Pierce, Pierce Investment Company, Pierce Investments, LLC. (Diehl, Samuel) Modified text on 8/12/2019 (MMP). Modified text on 8/12/2019 (MMP). |
Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. There is no parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary to report for Plaintiffs Hawkes Co., Inc., Kevin Pierce, Pierce Investment Company, Pierce Investments, LLC. (Diehl, Samuel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew Wheeler, United States Army Corps of Engineers, R.D. James (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7071617) filed by Kevin Pierce, Hawkes Co., Inc., Pierce Investments, LLC, Pierce Investment Company. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Diehl, Samuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.