Coury v. Smrcina
| Dustin Joseph Coury |
| Cynthia Lee Smrcina |
| 0:2019cv02200 |
| August 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| John R Tunheim |
| Elizabeth Cowan Wright |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 LETTER from Dakota County District Court Acknowledging Receipt of #9 Remand Order. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KDS) Document QC'd by KMH on 9/26/2019 (KMH). |
| Filing 10 LETTER from Clerk's Office to Dakota County District Court; enclosing Order of Remand. cc: Dakota County District Court re #9 Order on Stipulation. (MMP) |
Filing 9
ORDER approving #8 Stipulation and Consent for Remand. Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 8/23/2019. (HAZ) 1 c/c: Dakota County. Modified text on 8/26/2019 (MMP).
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Stipulation & Consent for Remand by Cynthia Lee Smrcina. (Angell, Christopher) |
|
Filing 7
(Text-only) ORDER/NOTICE TO ATTORNEY. This case is before the Court on the letter filed by Plaintiff requesting remand (Dkt. 6). To the extent Plaintiff seeks remand to state court, Plaintiff must file a motion pursuant to Local Rule 7.1. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 7.1. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 8/19/2019. (TMA)
|
| Filing 6 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Dustin Joseph Coury . (Schroeder, Richard) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER/NOTICE: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/12/2019. Pretrial Conference set for 9/19/2019 at 09:00 AM in Judge's Chambers, Suite 342 (STP) before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright on 8/14/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(TMA) Modified text on 8/15/2019 (MMP).
|
| Filing 4 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 19-cv-2200 (JRT/ECW). (lmb) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Cynthia Lee Smrcina. (Angell, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Cynthia Lee Smrcina. (Angell, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Dakota (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7073409) filed by Cynthia Lee Smrcina. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Affidavit of Service, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Angell, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Coury v. Smrcina | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cynthia Lee Smrcina | |
| Represented By: | Christopher G Angell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dustin Joseph Coury | |
| Represented By: | Richard J Schroeder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
