Picha et al v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
| Kristy Picha and Ryan Picha |
| Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS), SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., Northpointe Bank and CMG Mortgage, Inc |
| 0:2019cv02240 |
| August 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Michael J Davis |
| David T Schultz |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION #9 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Process of Removal, to Strike, Overrule, and Deny Defendants' Motion to Remove and to Remand to the State to Proceed Regarding Substantive and Common Law Jural Rights Protections #6 is DENIED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 10/9/2019. (GRR)
|
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. re #12 Response to Objection to Report and Recommendation (Brandt, Angela) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE TO OBJECTION to #10 Report and Recommendation filed by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. filed by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc..(Brandt, Angela) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Strike, Overrule, and Deny R&R and Motion to Remand filed by Kristy Picha, Ryan Picha. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MKB) Document QC'd by KMH on 10/2/2019 (KMH). |
| Filing 10 OBJECTION TO #9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION filed by Kristy Picha, Ryan Picha.(MKB) Document QC'd by KMH on 10/2/2019 (KMH). |
| Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #6 MOTION to Quash filed by Ryan Picha. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 9/10/2019. (KAR)cc: cc: Kristy Picha, Ryan Picha. Modified text on 9/11/2019 (MMP). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING #6 MOTION to Quash filed by Ryan Picha to Judge David T. Schultz. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 8/30/2019. (GRR) cc: Kristy Picha, Ryan Picha. Modified text on 8/30/2019 (lmb).
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Quash filed by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate, #2 Affidavit of Service)(Brandt, Angela) |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO QUASH PROCESS OF REMOVAL, TO STRIKE, OVERRULE, AND DENY DEFENDANTS MOTION TO REMOVE AND TO REMAND TO THE STATE TO PROCEED REGARDING SUBSTANTIVE AND COMMON LAW JURAL RIGHTS PROTECTIONS filed by Ryan Picha. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MMG) Document QC'd on 8/29/2019 (JGK). |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service by Northpointe Bank re #4 Notice of Appearance, #3 Notice of Appearance (Sauer, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric D Cook on behalf of Northpointe Bank. (Cook, Eric) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael R Sauer on behalf of Northpointe Bank. (Sauer, Michael) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per Civil (3rd, 4th - Master) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 19-cv-2240 (MJD/DTS). (lmb) cc: NEF and copy of docket sheet mailed to Ryan and Kristy Picha. Modified text on 8/14/2019 (lmb). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Anoka County District Court, case number 02-cv-19-3428 (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7079002) filed by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Affidavit of Service, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Brandt, Angela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
