Scott v. Janssen
Petitioner: Chris Scott
Respondent: Vicki Janssen
Case Number: 0:2019cv02343
Filed: August 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Presiding Judge: Hildy Bowbeer
Referring Judge: David S Doty
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2019 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Vicki Janssen re #10 Memorandum, #11 Appendix filed, #9 Response to Habeas Petition (Schmidt, Jonathan)
October 7, 2019 Filing 11 APPENDIX filed re #10 Memorandum, #9 Response to Habeas Petition . (Schmidt, Jonathan)
October 7, 2019 Filing 10 MEMORANDUM re #9 Response to Habeas Petition filed by Vicki Janssen. (Attachments: #1 LR7.1/LR72.2 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Schmidt, Jonathan)
October 7, 2019 Filing 9 RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Vicki Janssen. (Schmidt, Jonathan)
September 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Chris Scott. Show Cause Response due by 10/21/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer on 9/19/2019. (JMK) cc: Chis Scott on 9/19/2019 (KNK).
September 3, 2019 Filing 7 RECEIPT number 44641104488 in the amount of $5.00 issued to Chris Scott. (CLK) Document QC'd by KMH on 9/26/2019 (KMH).
September 3, 2019 Filing 6 LETTER TO DISTRICT JUDGE by Vicki Janssen . (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Schmidt, Jonathan)
August 30, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan P Schmidt on behalf of Vicki Janssen. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Schmidt, Jonathan)
August 28, 2019 Filing 4 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Vicki Janssen Attorney Substitution. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter Attorney Substitution)(Stockmeyer, Edwin)
August 28, 2019 (Text-Only) NOTICE - Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer's Practice Pointers, which have been recently revised, are available on the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota's #website. All parties are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these Practice Pointers, including any variances from Local Rules. (JMK) cc: Scott. (kt)
August 27, 2019 Filing 3 LETTER from Clerk's Office to Chris Scott re: NO FEE/IFP Letter. cc: Scott with IFP form. (JGK) Modified text on 9/4/2019 (CLK).
August 26, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Chris Scott re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (JGK) Modified text on 8/27/2019 (JGK).
August 26, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Chris Scott. Case assigned to Judge David S. Doty per 3rd/4th Prisoner list, referred to Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Cover Letter, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Envelope) (JGK) cc: Scott. Modified text on 8/27/2019 (JGK).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. Janssen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Vicki Janssen
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Represented By: Jonathan P Schmidt
Represented By: Edwin William Stockmeyer, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Chris Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?