Unum Life Insurance Company of America v. Jansen et al
| UNUM Life Assurance Company of America and Unum Life Insurance Company of America |
| Matthew Lynn Jansen, E.J. and Bradley Jansen |
| 0:2019cv02367 |
| August 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Michael J Davis |
| Katherine M Menendez |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 INTERPLEADER by Unum Life Insurance Company of America. (Wagener, Terrance) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to E.J., Bradley Jansen, Matthew Lynn Jansen. (KDS) |
| Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael J. Davis per 3rd/4th Civil Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez. Please use case number 19-cv-2367 MJD/KMM. (KDS) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Unum Group is a corporate parent of Plaintiff UNUM Life Assurance Company of America. (Wagener, Terrance) |
| Filing 1 INTERPLEADER COMPLAINT against E.J., Bradley Jansen, Matthew Lynn Jansen (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7108892) filed by UNUM Life Assurance Company of America. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wagener, Terrance) Modified text on 8/28/2019 (KDS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
