Hogquist v. State of Minnesota, the et al
Michelle Lyn Hogquist |
SGT Micheal Whitaker, Judge Nancy Lodger, Judicial Officer Kristin C. Larsen, State of Minnesota, the, Asst. Prosecutor Melissa Saterbrak, Judge Jennifer Walker-Jasper and Thomas Fitzpatrick |
0:2019cv02473 |
September 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Donovan W Frank |
David T Schultz |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING ALL DISPOSITIVE AND NON-DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS to Magistrate Judge Schultz. Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 9/12/2019. (las)cc: Michelle Lyn Hogquist on 9/16/2019 (KNK). |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Michelle Lyn Hogquist. (CLK) Document QC'd by KMH on 9/26/2019 (KMH). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Thomas Fitzpatrick, Kristin C. Larsen, Nancy Lodger, Melissa Saterbrak, State of Minnesota, the, Jennifer Walker-Jasper, Micheal Whitaker filed by Michelle Lyn Hogquist. No summons requested. Case assigned to Judge Donovan W. Frank per Civil (3rd, 4th - Civil Rights) list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet) cc NEF: Hogquist. (CLK) Modified text on 9/11/2019 (CLK). Document QC'd by KMH on 9/26/2019 (KMH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.