Fears v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
| Nathan Fears |
| Credit Technologies, Inc., RELX Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC |
| 0:2019cv02558 |
| September 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| David T Schultz |
| John R Tunheim |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER on #18 Stipulation. RELX Inc. answer due 11/22/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 11/12/2019. (TJB)
|
| Filing 19 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #18 Stipulation. (Parker, Andrew) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD (THIRD) by RELX Inc.. Jointly Signed by Nathan Fears. (Parker, Andrew) |
| Filing 17 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re Defendant RELX Inc.'s Motion for Third Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead #16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. (Parker, Andrew) |
| Filing 16 Third MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by RELX Inc.. (Parker, Andrew) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER on #13 Stipulation. RELX Inc. answer due 11/8/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 10/23/2019. (TJB)
|
| Filing 14 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #13 Stipulation. (Parker, Andrew) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD by RELX Inc.. Jointly Signed by Nathan Fears. (Parker, Andrew) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER/NOTICE FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Parties are directed to Meet and Confer by 12/3/2019. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/3/2019. Pretrial Conference set for 12/10/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9E (MPLS) before Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 10/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(TJB) Modified courtroom number on 10/9/2019 (lmb).
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER on #8 Stipulation. RELX Inc. answer due 10/25/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz on 9/30/2019. (TJB)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Running, Terri) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER TO JUDGE re #8 Stipulation. (Parker, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD by RELX Inc.. Jointly Signed by Nathan Fears. (Parker, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE/SUBSTITUTION for RELX Inc.. (Parker, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Equifax Information Services, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, CORRECTED [1-2] Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal (Running, Terri) |
| Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Chief Judge John R. Tunheim per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 19-cv-2558 (JRT/DTS). (MMP) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Equifax Information Services LLC re #3 Notice (Other), #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement (Running, Terri) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Equifax Information Services LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, Consent to Removal (Running, Terri) |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Equifax Inc. is a corporate parent of Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC. (Running, Terri) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-7157623) filed by Equifax Information Services LLC. No summons requested. (Attachments: #1 Summons and Complaint, #2DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR. WILL BE REFILED. Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Running, Terri) Modified text on 9/20/2019 (CLK). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
